pasteboardChangedOwner is not called as reliably as we'd want to get it,
so keep track of [pasteboard changeCount] and drop clipboard ownership
when a change happened. Also better unset the clipboard content redundantly
in a few places rather than missing one, and reorder the code in
gtk_clipboard_set_contents() so that the new aggressive unsetting
won't unset the clipboard under our feet when we call
[pasteboard declareTypes].
(cherry picked from commit f2b74db5dcbd28a1e27431f413c66d2a5d50b2bd)
We now support the keywords (like xx-small, medium, larger, smaller...)
and I've changed the default value to be "medium".
This required some shuffling of the "get default font size" code. But
all is well now.
The default font is no longer handled like a custom style sheet that
overrides everything, but as the initial value. This is the same
behavior as in web browsers.
And it allows the theme to actually use the 'font-family' and
'font-size' properties. Of course, a well behaved theme will respect the
setting as much as possible and for example use relative font sizes
(which aren't yet supported, but will be soon).
This gives a GtkSettings object for resolving system-dependant things -
like the default font family and font size.
No code does this yet, but we have an API.
Only GtkSettings implements this.
The new css tree may change the order of selectors (keeping the
same semantics). This affects how the selectors are printed later,
which causes some css parsing tests to not match the references.
Fortunately the order is consistent between runs given the same
css, so we just have to switch around the order in some of the
.ref.css files.
Now we use the selector tree everywhere, so there is no need to
keep around the linear selectors unless we're using them to
verify the tree correctness, so free them.
We add some "artificial" ordering to the otherwise unordered
tree nodes. This means the tree will be the same every time for the
same input. This is good because e.g. tree order affects the
reordering of the simple selectors, which may affect how
css providers are printed, which need to be consistent for
the css tests to work.
When building the tree we generally reorder the selectors inside
the same simple selector in order to pick a good first selector
to balance the tree better. However, some kinds of selectors
can't really be reordered, even thought they are simple.
This is since the matching code for some types handle
the existance of a directly preceeding selector differently:
REGION and ANY selectors look for a DESCENDANT previous
POSITION selector look for a REGION previous
From a set of GtkCssSelectors and the rulesets they match to
we create a large decision tree that lets us efficitently match
against all the rules and return the set of matched rulesets.
The tree is created such that at each level we pick the initial rule[1]
in all the considered selectors for that level and use put the
one that is in most selectors in the node. All selectors matching that
are put in the previous part of the tree.
This returns true if the matcher matches *anything*. We need
to check this later, because such matchers are dangerous in loops
that iterate over all parents/siblings since such loops would not
terminate.
