This is essentially a GtkCssImage for a cairo_surface_t and is a pretty
much straight up copy of GtkCssImageUrl. But we want to implement lazy
loading and animations, so GtkCssImageUrl is going to gain new
features...
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692934
I'd like to use it when printing the value, but I haven't found a way to
do that sanely yet, as I'd need to be able to print relative paths for
make check to work (otherwise the srcdir would blow things up). And we
use a GString to output to, so there's no way to attach a base dir to
that.
If anyone has an idea how to achieve that, poke me. Having the real
filename in debug prints sounds like a very good idea to me.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692934
This way, people know what stuff we are loading.
And instead of listing all the files in the top (and forgetting things),
we just take them from the resources list.
Commit ddceddaa84 removed the call to
gtk_style_context_set_background() in favour of always rendering it with
gtk_render_background() during the draw vfunc.
This has the side effect of making the backing window always
transparent, which blocks GTK from applying some optimizations during
the paint cycle. The result is that, especially in clutter-gtk
applications, scrolling performance gets really bad.
This commit partially reverts ddceddaa84
and changes the code so that both gtk_style_context_set_background() and
gtk_render_background() are called
Commit da09447914 removed the call to
gtk_style_context_set_background() in favour of always rendering it with
gtk_render_background() during the draw vfunc.
This has the side effect of making the backing window always
transparent, which blocks GTK from applying some optimizations during
the paint cycle. The result is that, especially in clutter-gtk
applications, scrolling performance gets really bad.
This commit partially reverts da09447914
and changes the code so that both gtk_style_context_set_background() and
gtk_render_background() are called.
gtk_tree_drag_source_drag_data_get's GtkSelectionData argument should not be
marked as (out) because:
a) GtkSelectionData is semi-private (it's declared in gtkselectionprivate.h),
and thus gobject-introspection has no knowledge of its fields or its size.
There is thus no way for language bindings to allocate GtkSelectionData.
b) Even if it was possible for language bindings to allocate GtkSelectionData,
a zeroed-out instance thus created would not be usable with
gtk_tree_drag_source_drag_data_get. As far as I can tell, you need to
initialize its "target" member to the GdkAtom of "GTK_TREE_MODEL_ROW".
Language bindings have no way of knowing this, of course.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692844
Since XIQueryVersion, the bad API that it is, enforces the version from
the first client that requests it, for clients to be able to use the new
features in XI2.3, we need to ensure that we pass XIQueryVersion 2.3 as
the version that we support. We know that GTK+ won't be confused by the
new features.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692467
The X server should fill in the minor version that it supports in the
case where it only supports the older version, so we can safely always
pass a higher version number than is potentially supported by the
server.
libXi was designed to be stable in the case where it doesn't recognize
requests or events/replies, so this should still work in a case where
we have new versions of the X server, and GTK+, but an old version of
libXi, at least for however well that setup should work.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692467
