Needed to adjust this again after applying commit 4e5ecb7
for bug 742281. Now that we also have max content size properties,
pushed the addition of possible scrollbar sizes to after the
clause which clamps the child request size into min/max content
sizes.
This patch causes the scrolled window default behavior to change in
such a way that the natural size request of the child is unconditionally
reported, which probably should have been the case since day 1.
This should not cause significant fallout since a scrolled window is
normally used to expand/fill, eating up remaining space for scrollable
content - it will however cause the scrolled window to compete for
additional space with siblings, proportionally to the size of the
scrolled window's content.
The GtkScrolledWindow has support to set the minimum content size (both
width and height) which controls the minimum space allocated, but does
not exposes any way to control the maximum size the content can grow.
After the introduction of GtkPopover, which always uses the minimum
size of it's children widgets, the lack of max-content-width and -height
properties became a concrete use case.
This patch introduces the GtkScrolledWindow::max-content-width and
-height properties. The properties will alter the minimum size of
the scrolled window, making it grow up to the set value. They also
respect the previously set ::min-content-width and -height.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=742281
GtkScrolledWindow leans towards using the minimum size of its child
widget, unless the scrollbar policy is GTK_POLICY_NEVER. This is
probably fine for most GtkScrollable implementations out there.
Especially when using GTK_SCROLL_MINIMUM, which is the default for all
implementations inside gtk+.
However, this is not good for GTK_SCROLL_NATURAL children. eg.,
VteTerminal's minimum size is 1x1 and natural size is the number of
visible rows and columns requested by the user. We really want to use
the natural size unless the user has resized the window to change that.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766569
This code tries to add the minimum content size, if one is set, to the
GtkScrolledWindow's size requisition. This is obvious from the check
for non-negative values of min-content-height and min-content-width.
Using MAX needlessly makes the code harder to read by implying that
there is more to it when there actually isn't.
Fall out from 0d9ebb501dhttps://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766569
When we are beginning to calculate the height, if the vscrollbar_policy
is not GTK_POLICY_NEVER, and there is no min-content-height, then we
need some small non-zero value to get started. The idea is to always
ask for at least enough to fit the horizontal scrollbar.
Simply put, this should be the mirror image of the corresponding width
calculation code.
Those who got used to the buggy behaviour might notice that their
GtkScrolledWindows are not as tall as they used to be.
Fall out from 55196a705fhttps://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766530
Children tend to call back into the scrolled window while being removed
and that doesn't work too well if the scrolled window is destroyed
already as Christian Hergert found out.
The implicit grab may be finished so the pointer lies on top of the other
scrollbar, in this case one scrollbar should lose the hovering state, and
the other should gain it. So we must check for proximity in both indicators.
We were not taking the scrollable borders into account when
requesting size for the scrolled window, which could lead
to underallocating the scrollbars at size allocation time
when we *did* take the borders into account.
This is most notable with treeviews, where we have the
headers as borders, and was causing the treeview-crash-too-wide
reftest to fail.
And use it to handle kinetic scrolling in the GtkScrolledWindow.
However, dropping the delta check causes the X11-based kinetic
scroll to break since we don't have the stop event here. Correct handling of
xf86-input-libinput-based scroll events is still being discussed.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756729
Otherwise it's attempted through a timeout, which gets cancelled early after,
and the slider disappears after a while with no mouse activity despite the
ongoing implicit grab.
Once the grab is finished, check_update_scrollbar_proximity() will be called
again on both scrollbars, and the fade out animation will be triggered as a
result.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754745
These days exposure happens only on the native windows (generally the
toplevel window) and is propagated down recursively. The expose event
is only useful for backwards compat, and in fact, for double buffered
widgets we totally ignore the event (and non-double buffering breaks
on wayland).
So, by not setting the mask we avoid emitting these events and then
later ignoring them.
We still keep it on eventbox, fixed and layout as these are used
in weird ways that want backwards compat.
In order to play along with child widgets that use scroll events for anything
else than scrolling, it will be better to do this in the bubble phase, so
the child widget has an opportunity to GDK_EVENT_STOP the event before we
trigger kinetic scrolling.
This of course won't work for widgets that choose to reimplement scroll event
handling themselves, they should be smart at resorting to GtkScrolledWindow's
scroll event handling.
This fixes kinetic scrolling kicking in too pervasively on widgets that eg.
implement zoom on scroll events.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=753495
The libinput driver will send a 0/0 scroll event on touchpads and other
devices where it knows scrolling stopped for sure. Use these events to
trigger kinetic scrolling from there.
The mechanism is similar to GtkGestureSwipe, we keep a backlog of the
latest dx/dy till a previous point in time, and calculate the final
velocities from there, with the difference we're dealing with scroll
units, and not pixel distances.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=749770
If a GtkScrolledWindow is just unmapped and promptly mapped again, the
indicators are left in a semi-visible state, so the GdkWindow isn't raised
properly above scrolledwindow content. This inconsistent state went away
the next time the indicator is hidden.
So, reset all state about indicator window visibility, animation
progress and conceil timer on ::unmap, this will be enough to make the
indicators start out hidden like on newly created scrolledwindows.
Libinput will use 0.0f on the "scrolling finished" event, so check for this
instead of rounding (<1 values are sort of frequent on touchpads). This
impedes bug #745315 to resurface after commit d563b943ed3.
When the scrolledwindow receives scroll events, it ensures the timeout to
maybe start the "snap back to edges" animation is reset, but it does nothing
about the animation source. It must be reset just the same, to maybe be
started after the timeout fires up.
The code managing scrollbars visibility was too pervasively checking for
mouse devices, leaving pen/eraser/cursor devices with no scrollbars at
all. Relax these checks a bit, and actually toggle full-width scrollbars
on pen/eraser devices, so it is an easier target.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747608
The coordinate translations here were not working properly
for window widgets inside the scrolled window, as can be
seen e.g. for the horizontal scrollbar of the 'Tree View'
example in gtk3-demo.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747406
When moving over a non-expanded indicator from the outside, we were
not expanding it, due to on_scrollbar being true. This can be seen
e.g. when moving from the content pane over to the sidebar indicator
in gtk3-demo. We must still ensure that the indicator is expanded
when receiving motion events over the indicator.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747407
This path is only intended to be triggered on events directed towards the
child of the scrolledwindow, so make it explicitly so. This avoids scrollbar
"over" state flashing when dragging finishes within the slider.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746961
