Otherwise, requesting a min size in em where the equivalent in px had a
fractional part would lead to the gadget getting allocated 1 too few px.
You could see this in the CSS property vs. allocation in the Inspector.
Note that margin/border/padding are left alone: the rationale is that we
do as browsers do, and Benjamin said we already do that for those,
whereas his tests on min-(width|height) showed otherwise. My subsequent
analysis indicated it to be far less clear-cut than that, but he remains
unconvinced that we should ceil() all the things! So just do these ones.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/issues/1088
It does not make sense to pass a for_size into the size allocation
machinery that is smaller than the min-size in that direction.
Warn if it happens, so we can track it down when it occurs.
The way we were adjusting baselines if min-height forces
a size increase was not quite working as intended. Redo
it in a simpler way: just split up the excess and count
half of it for above the baseline and half below.
This fixes button labels in dialogs appearing too low.
When size_allocate is overridden in widgets, but draw is not,
we can end up drawing a gadget that has not been given a size.
Warn about this, and limp along by drawing the gadget over the
full allocation of its owner widget.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762614
We were forcing the size to be at least min-height, but we left the
baselines as they were, which had the effect of making text e.g
in entries 'stick to the top'.
With this change, we adjust the baseline to keep the ratio of
baseline to height unchanged.
Margins can be negative, and if we are not careful, then
content+padding+margin can end up with negative dimensions,
which can upset pixman and others. This commit ensures
that a gadget will not request or draw boxes with negative
dimensions, and get_border_allocation and get_content_allocation
will not return boxes with negative dimensions.
This fixes a crash in the paned separator drawing code that
can be reproduced by setting separator padding to 0.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=759657
As GtkCssNode has the visibility concept, it makes sense to mirror it in
gadgets.
Do what visibility does in widgets: Hidden gadgets can't be drawn or
allocated and request a 0x0 size.
Note that just like widgets, gadget visibility must not be changed in
size request, allocate or draw handlers.
GtkWidget::child-visible has no equivalent yet, code will have to
emulate that manually.
Empty boxes end up setting the clip to { 0, 0, 0, 0}, so warning
for a width or height of 0 triggers false positives. Instead,
initialize the clip to clearly invalid values.
A gadget is halfway between a widget and a CSS node. It's supposed to
provide the minimum convenicence around CSS nodes until we've figured
out how to integrate them with widgets.
