Added GTK_BUILDER_ERROR_INVALID_PROPERTY and GTK_BUILDER_ERROR_INVALID_SIGNAL
error codes
ObjectInfo: Use a GType instead of a char * for the class name.
PropertyInfo: Use a GParamSpec instead of a char * for the property name.
SignalInfo: Use signal id and detail quark instead of a detailed signal name string.
This not only save us a few malloc in each case but lets us simplify the code
and report unknown properties and signals as a parsing error instead of just
printing a warning.
Binding an object sensitive property with a check button active property will look like this:
<object class="GtkButton" id="button">
<property name="sensitive" bind-source="checkbutton" bind-property="active"/>
</object>
This is based on the original work done by Denis Washington for his GSoC project
This closes Bug 654417 "[GSoC] Add <binding> element to GtkBuilder syntax"
- As the tests show, some of the functions have a strange and
inconsistent behavior for corner cases.
- Rename test_full_buffer() -> test_search_full_buffer() because
textiter.c is used for other GtkTextIter unit tests.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727908
In the unlikely case that there is another GPL released in the future
it would be best if we link directly to the 3.0 version of the
license description instead of the alias to the latest
version.
It seems that alternate implementations of GtkFileChooserWidget
never materialized. The split between GtkFileChooserWidget and
GtkFileChooserDefault is awkward. The immediate problem is that
it makes it difficult to document the keybinding signals. So it
makes sense to drop the abstraction and just have one thing.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=723157
The color chooser test is constantly running into the
problem that the custom color setting is not empty.
Avoid that by using the memory settings backend.
It would be nicer if we could have the tests specify what environment
their expected output was created in, then we could test multiple
scenarios. For now, just fix the setting to avoid test failures.
Stop trying to deal with "theoretical possibilities".
We can't possibly continue to be a faithful GActionGroup implementation
across dispose because dispose has a side effect of removing everyone's
signal handlers.
The code that we ran after the dispose chainup to do all of the fancy
signal emulation was therefore dead. The test that aimed to verify this
was buggy itself due to an uninitialised variable, so really, it never
worked at all.
We keep the re-ordering of the chainup from the original commit to avoid having
trouble with GtkActionMuxer and keep the checks in place that will prevent an
outright segfault in the case that someone else tries to use the interface
post-dispose.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722189
The signal callbacks are defined to take pointers as their arguments, but the
callbacks found in testsuite/gtk/builder.c are passing a GParamSpec by value
as the second argument. This confuses and angers the compiler on ppc64el,
resulting in segfaults after return from the function due to stack-smashing
by the (completely-unused) argument.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721700
