The paned examples on page 2 were implicitly relying on labels
drawing unclipped. Instead of setting the view class only on the
labels, set it on the paned's instead.
The overlap was caused by using pack-end for the arrow, which
causes it to be allocated from the other end. Avoid the problem
by using pack-start for both the title and the arrow, and
reordering them according to xalign.
... so that it works with wide separators. Or rather: with separators
that don't request 1px size but any other number. Do that by making the
placeholder request the same size by indeed stuffing (hidden) separators
in it.
Some of the features we expose can be hardcoded via environment
variables. In that case, don't confuse the user by letting them
change settings that have no effect.
The displacement animation has been replaced by edge gradients, that
have a stronger color the harder overshooting is hit. This makes it
possible to remove the internal overshoot window, which was merely
used to have contents displaced when overshooting to top/left.
Overshooting to bottom/right used to cause queue_resize() to be
called on the scrolled window, this isn't necessary anymore either.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731297
There was this hack, taken verbatim from GtkCList according to the comment,
that would recursively translate the allocation during scrolling, and set
it on children widgets through the direct gtk_widget_set_allocation() setter.
Since commit 4f89eb05cf, this has caused the wrong clipping areas to children
widgets of a textview. The reasons for this seem lost in time, and the approach
seems indeed wrong for windowed widgets as the repositioning of those windows
couldn't happen.
So replace all of this with just a gtk_widget_size_allocate() call, which does
work ok for the children widgets embedded in the "multiple views" gtk demo, and
ought to work for every other widget.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732900
The reparenting happening on the column header so it gets a movable
window breaks the implicit grab, so this is one situation were we
want a pointer grab, if just to replace it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732933
