Previously, we were showing and hiding the custom titlebar
widget in response to state changes such as maximization.
Instead, use gtk_widget_set_child_visible() and leave
show/hide to applications. This makes it possible to set
a custom titlebar and hide it, for a titlebar-less appearance.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=707132
When loading a symbolic icon, g_file_get_contents() is currently used
with the icon pathname, to load its SVG data. This won't work when the
icon is not a local file, for instance when a symbolic icon is loaded
from a GFileIcon with a GResource path.
Fortunately GtkIconInfo already holds a GFile, so we can just use
g_file_load_contents() to load the data instead.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=709056
Updated documentation to specify that '0' should be specified if
one does not need to automatically assign a bound child to a public
or private instance member (now that negative values are private
structure offsets).
If we start with a padding of -1 then it can leak out of the size
allocation request for the column when the treeview is empty. The
GtkTreeView will then collect these -1 values and add them together,
returning -n where 'n' is the number of columns.
This is usually not a problem because treeviews tend to be used with a
scrollbar and the width of the scrollbar will be added to this number
bringing it into positive territory again. On Ubuntu, with overlay
scrollbars, this is not the case, however.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=703062
The size of the shadow and invisible borders can (and usually
will) change between backdrop and focused windows, while the
overall window size remains unchanged. This causes the visible
window to visually 'jump'. We can avoid this by always reserving
the maximum of the focused and unfocused border sizes. The code
for positioning the input-only windows making up the invisible
border is adjusted to deal with this. We now always place the
invisible border right outside the visible content, even if the
shadow extends out much farther.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=707524
And use the "header" style class to do that.
This allows themes to set e.g. the background of the tab header
differently.
Themes will need slight adjustment to make things appear
as before.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643914
This allows subclasses of GtkTextView that require a corresponding
subclass of GtkTextBuffer to automatically do the right thing when
constructed with a NULL buffer. An example of this is GtkSourceView
which requires a GtkSourceBuffer.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708584
Improve optimization, by re-enabling WholeProgramOptimization but changing
the linker optimization to not drop items that are not referenced in code
(such as compiled gresource sources that are not directly referenced in
code, as they are still needed for the demos to run properly).
The GtkStack and GtkStackSwitcher code did not really
follow GTK+ conventions for includes. Fix that, and also
fix up a case of gpointer vs gpointer* confusion
in gtkstack.c.
This adds new 'over' and 'under' transitions which work by moving
the new page over the previous one, or moving the previous page off
to reveal the new one. We also add an over/under combination that
is going to be used in GtkAboutDialog.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=707187
Some of the labels were not marked as no-show-all. But the
code clearly tries to manage their visibility, so gtk_widget_show_all()
should not affect them.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=681484
The child property is watched by the StackSwicther which in turns sets a
needs-attention css class on the corresponding button, so that the theme
can for instance show a throbbing animation if one of the hidden pages
needs the user attention.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=707153
So far, this is just supposed to be gdk_cairo_set_source_pixbuf().
Note that this is usually not an API guarantee but courtesy to
applications that used these APIs without a gtk_init() call.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708547
If an icon is in a Fixed or Threshold directory we normally don't
scale it. However, in the case of HiDPI scaling we *do* want to
scale it, to avoid different layouts in Lo/HiDPI. We look up whatever
the size of the icon would have been in LoDPI and scale to that
in the no-scaling case, thus getting the same layout as the
unscaled case.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708384
