icontheme: Recolor <polygon> elements in SVGs too
See merge request GNOME/gtk!443
(cherry picked from commit 5b049364dcc1ecab1a0695d7bce82268ffd11d18)
284d9093 icontheme: Recolor <polygon> elements in SVGs too
If the revealer is told do animate and then unrealize itself, we do
(correctly) stop the animation, but used to do a shortcut where we
just set the target state as current.
Other things are dependent on the animation properly finishing though,
like the contained widget child visibility. This may lead to inconsistent
state where gtk_revealer_get_child_revealed() returns TRUE but the child
widget is unmapped, or vice-versa.
Fully finish the animation here, so the child state is coherent the next
time the revealer is mapped. We can also skip notifying on the property
since it will be handled by gtk_revealer_set_position().
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues/316
If the child is not (partly) revealed, don’t allocate it, or we spam the
console with warnings about giving negative width to children’s gadgets.
We can check :child-visible, which is FALSE if (current&target)_pos == 0
Close https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/issues/1057
Calling the accessibility function `grab_focus()` on a `GtkCell` under
Wayland will cause the client to crash.
This is another case of `gdk_x11_get_server_time()` being called
regardless of the actual windowing backend used.
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/issues/1507
Surface returned from gtk_icon_helper_load_surface can be smaller
then requested pixel size. This happens when icon is embedded in
panel that has bigger size then loaded pixbuf.
Fixes#1280, tray icons not drawing background. This is a magic pattern only
usable for gdk_window_set_background_pattern() that sets the underlying
X window's background to ParentRelative.
`gtk_widget_accessible_grab_focus()` code checks that X11 isenabled at
build time and uses X11 specific functions such as
`gdk_x11_get_server_time()` regardless of the actual backend being used.
Check that we are using an X11 display when X11 is backend enabled, so
we do not crash when running on Wayland
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/issues/1507
- based on a patch by frederik.feichtmeier <frederik.feichtmeier@gmail.com>
I'm certain this is something we had initially, but can't recall
why we got rid of it for the more visually distracting dashed line.
We can always revert when Lapo shows up and slams us with that broken
use case. I'm guessing non-white bgs.
- So far it looks way less distracting than the dashed line
gtk_internal_return_val_if_fail operates only in debug mode,
quartz can call this with a NULL that crashes in
GTK_STYLE_PROVIDER_PRIVATE_GET_INTERFACE.
- introduce $menu_radius
- use it for menus and context-menus
- use the popover box-shadow also for menus
- use padding for menus to avoid edge overlapping
- remove the background for menus to avoid bleeding out of the round edges
Issue #1495 showed that the docs of GtkGrid retain outdated implications
that (as was once, but is no longer, the case) it is intended to replace
GtkBox, by discussing HfW and widget properties in a way that suggests
GtkBox can't handle them. But of course it does, and it's preferable for
simple single-row/column cases. Worse, we said GtkGrid “provides exactly
the same functionality” for the latter case, but the original point of
that Issues was that it doesn’t, at least for CSS positional selectors!
Box:
• Use an actually meaningful @Short_description.
• Remove unhelpful @See_also references to unrelated containers.
• Remove references to “rectangular area”: it might be another shape
via CSS, or “rectangular” might falsely imply 2 dimensions of children.
• Mention Orientable:orientation.
• Emphasise usefulness of :[hv]align for allocating in the other axis.
• Don’t say that Grid “provides exactly the same functionality” for a
single row or column, since (A) it is overkill for that case and (B)
said Issue proved that it *doesn’t* for CSS child order, for example.
• Note in the child properties that are remove in master that we have
better, preferred alternatives available now in GtkWidget/CSS props.
There’s no nice way to deprecate these, though they’re gone in GTK+ 4.
• Correct a copy-paste-o from the blurb of :expand to :fill.
Grid:
• Remove references to deprecated widgets: GtkTable and Gtk[HV]Box.
• Don’t dwell on widget properties and height-for-width in a way that
wrongly implies that Box can’t handle those (or Grid can better). In
fact, just get rid of that bit altogether: Box handles them fine, and
Table is so old as to be not worth mentioning (in anything except the
2 => 3 migration guide) and points to Grid in its deprecation notice.
• Point to GtkBox as being preferred for the simple row/column use case.
Append a variation selector to the Emoji sequences,
to force Emoji presentation. Without this, some
Emoji come out with text presentation by default.
Closes: Pango #334
- step back on toning down the borders. Flatness !> legibility.
- darker active state for light
- draw gradinets from bottom up, to keep px sized shading regardless
of button size.
We wrap SVG data from icons within another SVG with extra styling
information. The wrapped SVG may contain characters that cannot be
part of a data: URL (https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#data-urls).
Librsvg 2.45 got more strict in its parsing of data: URLs; whereas
previously it ignored '#' characters in them, now it considers them to
be the start of a fragment identifier, which is not allowed in data:
URLs anyway.
To avoid unallowed characters, we now create a data: URL with a
base-64 encoded SVG.
Fixes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/issues/1471
We display a list of supported protocols in the server_addresses_popover.
However, this curated list contains protocols which may or may not be
available, depending on the respective gvfs backend being installed.
So, populate the list only with protocols which are available.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/issues/1476
When the user types an address with a schema that is not supported,
the Connect button doesn't become sensitive, but there is no visible
feedback at all.
This feels unresponsive and leaves the user clueless.
While it doesn't help explain why the address doesn't work, this will
provide a hint that the input was acknowledged but doesn't work.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/issues/1476
It is permissable to remove a widget using gtk_container_remove from the
gtk_container_foreach callback handler. Document this fact to make it
more discoverable.
Fixes#1461
