GdkWindow's before_process_all_updates() and after_process_all_updates()
wrongly assume that all displays are from the same class, which is not
the case if for example a client open different displays with different
backends such as X11 and Wayland.
Use the actual class for each display in the display list to avoid a
crash when mixing displays from different classes.
Fix suggested by Christian Persch <chpe@gnome.org> in bug #776472.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776472
Make sure to clear up the number of keys being pressed on enter/leave so
that we don't end up with leftovers if a new window is mapped by a
keyboard shortcut.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=779374
The key repeat is stopped as soon as a key is pressed, so if the user
quickly presses a key while another is already pressed and being
repeated, key repeat gets cancelled:
- key1 press
- key1 repeat
- key2 press -> key1 repeat stopped
- key1 release
- key 2 is not repeated even though it's kept depressed
This is a different behavior from X11, which confuses migrating users.
To mimic the X11 behavior, keep track of the number of keys pressed
simultaneously and cancel key repeat only when none is pressed.
This way, if a user pressed a key while another one is being repeated,
the new key press can possibly be repeated as well.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778019
When resizing an xdg_popup immediately after the initial mapping, there
is a race condition between the client and the compositor which is
processing the initial size given by the xdg_positioner, leading to the
xdg_popup to be eventually of the wrong size.
Only way to make sure the size is correct in that case is to hide and
show the window again. Considering this occurs before the initial
configure is processed, it should not be noticeable.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=772505
When the GtkWidget hierarchy does not match the GdkWindow hierarchy, the
GtkWidget code may find a common ancestor that cannot be found while
traversing the GdkWindow tree using gdk_window_get_effective_parent().
This happens with for example on Wayland, a GtkPopover has another
GtkPopover as parent, in this case, the GdkWindow parent is the root
window, whereas the GtkWidget parent is the other GtkPopover.
That confuses the gtk_widget_translate_coordinates() logic which will
bail out in this case and won't return the translated coordinates.
Make gdk_window_get_effective_parent() aware of subsurfaces and use the
transient_for which represents the actual parent (whereas the parent
might be pointing to the root window).
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=774148
Some drivers don't do that (not sure whether that is the correct behaviour
or not). Remember each WT_PROXIMITY with LOWORD(lParam) != 0 that we get,
then look for a WT_CSRCHANGE. If WT_CSRCHANGE doesn't come, but a WT_PACKET
does, assume that this device is the one that sent WT_PROXIMITY.
Also include fallback code to ensure that WT_PACKETs for an enabled device
disable the system pointer, because WT_PROXIMITY handler might have
enabled it by mistake, since it's not possible to know which device left
the proximity (it might have been a disabled device).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778328
Previously HiDPI scale was retrieved and applied too late in the initialization
process to affect monitor size and monitor workarea size, but the code that
initializes these sizes *did* try to use the scale, even though it was always
getting scale=1.
To fix this, move the too-late code into monitor enumeration routine.
This also fixes a probable semantic bug where width and height were divided
by scale, again.
Now monitor and workarea should be in application pixels (i.e. divided by scale),
as intended.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778835
Otherwise we wait for the next gdk_drag_motion() call, which will
happen on the next motion event, making the drag window briefly visible
on the 0,0 root coordinates.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778203
Clamping the anchor values as introduced in commit 9a5ffcd to fix bug
777176 breaks menu positioning.
By keeping the anchors rectangle size greater than zero, we end up
deducting some positive value from the original position, so there is no
need to clamp() actually, keeping the values positive is enough and
avoids the issue with menu positioning on the menubar.
An additional benefit is to make the code a lot simpler.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778009
Currently hiding destroys the wl_surface and all related interfaces,
(including the gtk_surface1) so the next time the GdkWindow is mapped,
we don't bother to set the DBus properties. Toggle the check off so
it's actually issued again after the GdkWindow gets a gtk_surface1.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=773686
Previously GDK only made up monitors when it initially found none. Now it
also makes up monitors when it initially finds some, but later fails to get
their informatin in a normal way and finally prunes them out, being left with
zero monitors.
Having zero-length monitor array is unexpected and causes a number
of critical warnings and some critical functionality (such as displaying
drop-down menus) fails in such cases.
Ideally, there might be such a way to interrogate W32 API that produces the
information about non-real (but active) monitors out of it so that it isn't
necessary for us to make stuff up. However, this code is already complicated,
and i am not prepared to dig W32 API to find a way to do this.
This fixes the issues people had when they accessed a Windows desktop via RDP.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=777527
This is how windows are meant to be hidden as per the wayland
protocol, there's no need to destroy the xdg_surface and other
interfaces.
Also, rename gdk_wayland_window_hide_surface() to clear_surface(),
as that's what it does.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=773686
Elsewhere we already go through the keymap to get modifiers so we
should do the same here. In fact, this was relying on xkb modifier
mask values being bitwise compatible with GdkModifierType which isn't
necessarily true.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=770112
