cssvalue: Add _gtk_css_value_equal()
For now, we return FALSE for all default css values, so this is not very useful. I also think of this as an optimization equal, not a guaranteed equal, because we don't even have a notion of what "equal" means. For example, for background-repeat, "repeat, repeat" and "repeat" are functionally equivalent. But the cssvalue has no idea that it's used for background-repeat. As a more complicated example, "repeat, no-repeat" and "repeat" are equal to what one sees as long as there's only one image listed background-image-source. But once you start transition'ing to an image with 2 sources, it's different...
This commit is contained in:
@ -40,6 +40,25 @@ gtk_css_value_array_free (GtkCssValue *value)
|
||||
g_slice_free1 (sizeof (GtkCssValue) + sizeof (GtkCssValue *) * (value->n_values - 1), value);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static gboolean
|
||||
gtk_css_value_array_equal (const GtkCssValue *value1,
|
||||
const GtkCssValue *value2)
|
||||
{
|
||||
guint i;
|
||||
|
||||
if (value1->n_values != value2->n_values)
|
||||
return FALSE;
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < value1->n_values; i++)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!_gtk_css_value_equal (value1->values[i],
|
||||
value2->values[i]))
|
||||
return FALSE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return TRUE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void
|
||||
gtk_css_value_array_print (const GtkCssValue *value,
|
||||
GString *string)
|
||||
@ -62,6 +81,7 @@ gtk_css_value_array_print (const GtkCssValue *value,
|
||||
|
||||
static const GtkCssValueClass GTK_CSS_VALUE_ARRAY = {
|
||||
gtk_css_value_array_free,
|
||||
gtk_css_value_array_equal,
|
||||
gtk_css_value_array_print
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user