css selector: Use the quarks we have
Unless I'm missing something, there is no reason to go from quarks back to strings to implement hasing or comparison.
This commit is contained in:
@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ struct _GtkCssSelectorClass {
|
||||
void (* print) (const GtkCssSelector *selector,
|
||||
GString *string);
|
||||
/* NULL or an iterator that calls func with each submatcher of @matcher.
|
||||
* Potentially no submatcher exissts.
|
||||
* Potentially no submatcher exists.
|
||||
* If any @invocation of @func returns %TRUE, the function will immediately
|
||||
* return %TRUE itself. If @func never returns %TRUE (or isn't called at all),
|
||||
* %FALSE will be returned.
|
||||
@ -798,15 +798,14 @@ match_class (const GtkCssSelector *selector,
|
||||
static guint
|
||||
hash_class (const GtkCssSelector *a)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return g_str_hash (g_quark_to_string (a->style_class.style_class));
|
||||
return a->style_class.style_class;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int
|
||||
comp_class (const GtkCssSelector *a,
|
||||
const GtkCssSelector *b)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return strcmp (g_quark_to_string (a->style_class.style_class),
|
||||
g_quark_to_string (b->style_class.style_class));
|
||||
return a->style_class.style_class - b->style_class.style_class;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
DEFINE_SIMPLE_SELECTOR(class, CLASS, print_class, match_class, hash_class, comp_class, FALSE, TRUE, FALSE)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user